Want to Build Wealth, and be Secure? Focus on Learning Instead of Earning!

Posted: January 18th, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Tips | Tags: , , , , | 6 Comments »

I just finished reading Robert Kiyosaki’s book, Rich Dad’s Increase Your Financial I.Q.: Get Smarter with Your Money and the one major takeaway is that too many people never realize their true financial potential because the get in their own way! Many people focus on earning more money when they should be focuses their time and energy on learning and increasing their money I.Q..

* Note: Kiyosaki discusses 5 aspects of Financial I.Q. in his book, but I’m just going to focus on this one, general concept here.

hamster wheel Want to Build Wealth, and be Secure? Focus on Learning Instead of Earning!The learning discussed in the book is not a formal education. In fact, that’s one of the mistakes that many people make – amassing huge amounts of debt going to college in the hopes of “finding a good job” and their place on the financial treadmill, only for some it’s more like a hamster wheel.

So what does “focus on learning” mean if not the traditional, middle class mantra “go to college to get a good job”?

It means taking risks and chances while you’re young, and always learning from your mistakes as well as your successes. People come into money all the time, sometimes mass amounts of it only to lose it all later. Think of lottery winners, famous athletes and performing artists. Suddenly rich, then suddenly broke. Why? Because they didn’t increase their 2nd financial I.Q. after mastering the 1st. They simply did what they loved doing and fell into their riches, but never learned how to manage and protect their wealth.

The first two financial I.Q.’s in the book are :

  1. earning more money.
  2. learning how to protect that money.

In the example of the star athlete or lottery winner, they mastered I.Q. #1 but failed horribly at I.Q. #2 – protecting their money.

Protection can mean many different things, and is usually referred to as “security” by many people. They may want to be secure in the knowledge that their savings are safe from loss, or maybe they want to protect their savings and assets from legal action. Whatever meaning you take, once you’ve earned it you must get educated on how to keep it or risk losing it all.

But even losing it all isn’t the end.

There are many well known moguls, like Donald Trump, who have built vast financial empires and lost it all only to come roaring back again. Why? Because they learned from their experience and were not afraid to fail.

” Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
-George Santayana

If you do not learn from your mistakes, you will keep making them and make little or no progress in life.

I’ve always thought it’s important to learn from your own mistakes, but it’s also important to learn from other people’s mistakes as well.

Here are a few resources to help boost your financial I.Q.:

Related Posts:


Robert Kiyosaki Plays Loose With His Math in Financial I.Q.

Posted: January 16th, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Investing, Reviews | Tags: , , , | No Comments »
2422267 L Robert Kiyosaki Plays Loose With His Math in Financial I.Q.

Robert Kiyosaki, Financial IQ

I’ve been reading Rich Dad’s Increase Your Financial IQ: Get Smarter with Your Money, by Robert Kiyosaki and while I like the general gist of the book (especially the first half), Kiyosaki rubs me wrong way in several places. One of these is in his use of math to support his opinions on real estate.

Much of the second half of the book focuses on real estate as a means to grow wealth, but Kiyosaki does make an important distinction between speculating for growth or flipping a house, and buying property as an investment. In other words, Kiyosaki espouses buying real estate for the purpose of renting it out and creating a cash flow, not hoping for the market to rise and create capital gains. I’m not really interested in becoming a renter, but his approach makes a lot of sense to me, especially with the current economy, housing market and demographic changes.

The problem with Robert Kiyosaki’s math in Financial IQ

Where I have problems is when he gets into things like OPM (Other People’s Money). Here is one of his examples:

  • He buys a rental property for $100,000 in cash.
  • He is able to rent this property for an annual income of $10,000.
  • He has made a 10% return on his investment.

So far, so good. He’s using very simple math and ignoring taxes, repairs, etc.. but that’s fine – he states that in the example. His problem is in his comparison to the same scenario but using OPM. Here’s his example using OPM (i.e. money from the bank – a mortgage):

  • He buys a rental property for $100,000.
  • He puts $50,000 down and the bank loans him the other $50,000 at 6% interest.
  • He is able to rent this property for an annual income of $10,000.
  • He has made a 20% return on his investment.

The problem is that he has not made a 20% return on his investment – unless he is a deadbeat and doesn’t pay his mortgage! While it is true that $10,000 in profit would be a 20% return on $50,000 invested he is ignoring the mortgage payment entirely!

Using the Mortgage loan payment calculator at BankRate.com, I plugged in a $50,000 mortgage over 30 years (I’m being generous in giving him a low monthly payment) at 6% (his figure in the book) I determined the monthly mortgage payment to be :

$299.78

This works out to be $3,597.36 annually, which makes his actually profit in the OPM example $6,402.64 not $10,000. That means his return on investment (ROI) in that example is 12.8% not 20%.

Granted, 12.8% is better than 10% but it’s a far cry from 20%!

This makes me wonder about the rest of his examples and stories. What if the mortgage were larger or the rent less? Someone reading this book may think it’s a slam dunk only to find that his property and mortgage alter the numbers to a point where he’s not profitable. Kiyosaki neglects to mention that part of the financial equation altogether.

Still, Robert Kiyosaki’s Financial IQ  book is quite motivating and offers much food for thought and for that alone it is worth the read in my opinion.

Related Posts: